W system

20 accepted literature values from 5 paper(s) (experimental 6, model 7, DFT 1, unspecified 6); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental6
model7
DFT1
unspecified6
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
crystal structure17
other property3

Other properties

Crystal structure (17)

Crystal structure, W system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a3.174 ÅW
alloy: W 1
model[1] Huang 2020Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Lattice a3.185 ÅW
alloy: W 1
DFT[2] Lieser 2012Table 1, p. 4, row 7
report
Lattice a3.19 ÅW
alloy: W 1
model[2] Lieser 2012
cites Wang 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 4, row 9
report
Lattice a3.165 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
experimental[1] Huang 2020
cites Goetz 1964
Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
Lattice a3.166 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
experimental[2] Lieser 2012
cites Braun 1960
Table 1, p. 4, row 8
report
Lattice a3.3 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
model[3] Li 2013
cites Daams 1991
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Lattice a3.1665 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[4] Duschanek 1995
cites ref. 65Rud
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Lattice a3.1652 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
model[4] Duschanek 1995
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
Lattice b3.174 ÅW
alloy: W 1
model[1] Huang 2020Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Lattice b3.165 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
experimental[1] Huang 2020
cites Goetz 1964
Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
Lattice c3.174 ÅW
alloy: W 1
model[1] Huang 2020Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Lattice c3.165 Å298.15W
alloy: W 1
experimental[1] Huang 2020
cites Goetz 1964
Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.1802 ÅPure W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 10
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.1652 ÅPure W
alloy: W 1
experimental[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.1934 ÅPure W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
lattice v31.75 nm3 × 10^3298.15W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[4] Duschanek 1995
cites ref. 65Rud
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
lattice v31.71 nm3 × 10^3298.15W
alloy: W 1
model[4] Duschanek 1995
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report

Other property (3)

Other property, W system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
337.3 GPaPure W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 10
report
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
310.4 GPaPure W
alloy: W 1
experimental[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
314 GPaPure W
alloy: W 1
unspecified[5] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 6
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Y.-Y. Huang, B. Wu, F. Li, L.-L. Chen, Z.-X. Deng, K. Chang, First-principles and CALPHAD-type study of the Ir-Mo and Ir-W systems, J min metall B Metall 56, 109-118 (2020). doi:10.2298/jmmb190211001h
  2. Alyson C. Lieser, Chelsey L. Zacherl, Arkapol Saengdeejing, Zi-Kui Liu, Laszlo J. Kecskes, First-principles calculations and thermodynamic re-modeling of the Hf–W system, Calphad 38, 92-99 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.04.005
  3. Yan Li, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Cuiping Guo, Thermodynamic optimization of the Nb–Si–W ternary system, Calphad 43, 112-123 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.04.004
  4. H. Duschanek, P. Rogl, Critical assessment and thermodynamic calculation of the binary system boron-tungsten (B-W), JPE 16, 150-161 (1995). doi:10.1007/bf02664852
  5. P. E. A. Turchi, V. Drchal, J. Kudrnovský, C. Colinet, Larry Kaufman, Zi-Kui Liu, Application of<i>ab initio</i>and CALPHAD thermodynamics to Mo-Ta-W alloys, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005). doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.094206