Ge–P system

41 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 14, model 9, DFT 17, unspecified 1); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental14
model9
DFT17
unspecified1
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction1
formation17
heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy5
crystal structure18

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GeP-21Don.tdbH. Dong, X. Tao, M. Paulasto-Krockel, J. Electron. Mater., 50, 4272-88(2021). doi:10.1007/s11664-021-08861-4e3a892ddc27c212777cacd4787f0d45cda2d7ce6dc4375cc2a69da0e1a08c3b6viewer · TDB · JSON
GeP-22Che.tdbS. Chen, J. Wang, S. Yu, B. Hu, Q. Wu, Y. Du, J. Electron. Mater., 51, 2114-30(2022). doi:10.1007/s11664-022-09474-13ebe2eeb4e7cc01d744d68c0e8a9eb6f7cf2c49d87a27d84759933a481f77c56viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GeP-21Don.tdb1002DIAMOND_A4 (x(P) 0.00248) + GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.62661)
GeP-21Don.tdb1002DIAMOND_A4 (x(P) 0.00248) + GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.6265)
GeP-21Don.tdb844.95GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.97546) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-21Don.tdb844.95GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.97562) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-21Don.tdb844.95GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.97567) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-21Don.tdb844.95GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.97567) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-22Che.tdb990.22DIAMOND_A4 (x(P) 0) + GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.59679)
GeP-22Che.tdb990.22DIAMOND_A4 (x(P) 0) + GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.59634)
GeP-22Che.tdb990.22DIAMOND_A4 (x(P) 0) + GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.59623)
GeP-22Che.tdb841.27GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.96512) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-22Che.tdb841.27GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.96553) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-22Che.tdb841.27GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.96556) + RED_P (x(P) 1)
GeP-22Che.tdb841.27GEP (x(P) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(P) 0.96556) + RED_P (x(P) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull GeP-21Don

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ge–P system (1)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
998.15peritectic: liquid + Ge → GePexperimental[1] Dong 2021p. 3
report
The T - x diagram includes the liquidus boundaries and two invariant reactions, i.e. (i) peritectic reaction of liquid + Ge → GeP at 725°C (liquid composition ~ 63 at.% P), and (ii) an undefined invariant reaction involving liquid, P and GeP.

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ge–P system (17)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Ge1P1GeP-13.82 kJ/mol-atom298.15model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[1] Dong 2021Table II, p. 6, row 6
report
Ge1P1GeP-13.6 kJ/mol-atom298.15model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[1] Dong 2021
cites Barin 1977 doi
Table II, p. 6, row 5
report
Ge1P1GeP-12.56 kJ/mol-atom298.15experimental0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[1] Dong 2021
cites Zumbusch 1939 doi
Table II, p. 6, row 1
report
Ge1P1-12.19 per mol-atom ± 1.5298.15experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Suess 1982
Table II, p. 6, row 3
report
Ge1P1GeP-10.5 kJ/mol-atom298.15model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[1] Dong 2021
cites Lide 2005
Table II, p. 6, row 2
report
GeP-11.4818 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Kirklin 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
GeP-11.48 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Kirklin 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
GePGeP-11.442 kJ/mol-atom298.15model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[2] Chen 2022Table II, p. 3, row 51
report
GePGeP-11.44 kJ/mol-atom0model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[2] Chen 2022
cites Saal 2013
Table II, p. 3, row 48
report
GeP-3.86 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 5
report
GeP-3.85941 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Curtarolo 2012 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 5
report
GePGeP-0.17 kJ/mol-atom0unspecified0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[2] Chen 2022Table II, p. 3, row 50
report
GeP-0.072364 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
GeP-0.072 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
GePGeP1.44 kJ/mol-atom0model0.383 (mp-aaackifz)-11.483 (oqmd-1349377)[2] Chen 2022
cites ref. 36
Table II, p. 3, row 49
report
GeP1.44728 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Jain 2013 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
GeP1.45 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Jain 2013 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 4
report

Other properties

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (5)

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy, Ge–P system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy
printed: S298 0
30.54 J/mol-atom/K298.15Ge1P1
alloy: P 0.5
model[1] Dong 2021
cites Barin 1977 doi
Table II, p. 6, row 5
report
Entropy
printed: S298 0
26.42 J/mol-atom/K298.15Ge1P1
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Ugai 1979
Table II, p. 6, row 4
report
Entropy
printed: S298 0
25.57 J/mol-atom/K298.15Ge1P1
alloy: P 0.5
model[1] Dong 2021Table II, p. 6, row 6
report
Entropy
printed: S0_298
27.64 per mol-atom ± 3.32298.15Ge1P1
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Suess 1982
Table II, p. 6, row 3
report
Entropy
printed: S298 0
31.5 J/mol-atom/K298.15Ge1P1
alloy: P 0.5
model[1] Dong 2021
cites Lide 2005
Table II, p. 6, row 2
report

Crystal structure (18)

Crystal structure, Ge–P system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a
printed: a
15.5183 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Jain 2013 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
Lattice a
printed: a
15.1948 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
Lattice a
printed: a
15.334 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Kirklin 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
Lattice a
printed: a
15.1948 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Lee 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 2
report
Lattice a
printed: a
15.14 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 1
report
Lattice a15.334 Å298.15GeP
alloy: Ge 0.5, P 0.5
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 13
report
Lattice b
printed: b
3.68332 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Jain 2013 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
Lattice b
printed: b
3.6337 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
Lattice b
printed: b
3.669 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Kirklin 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
Lattice b
printed: b
3.6337 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Lee 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 2
report
Lattice b
printed: b
3.638 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 1
report
Lattice b3.669 Å298.15GeP
alloy: Ge 0.5, P 0.5
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 13
report
Lattice c
printed: c
9.39563 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Jain 2013 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
Lattice c
printed: c
9.1941 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021Table I, p. 5, row 6
report
Lattice c
printed: c
9.095 Å0GeP
alloy: P 0.5
DFT[1] Dong 2021
cites Kirklin 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 3
report
Lattice c
printed: c
9.1941 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Lee 2015 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 2
report
Lattice c
printed: c
9.19 ÅGeP
alloy: P 0.5
experimental[1] Dong 2021
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 5, row 1
report
Lattice c9.274 Å298.15GeP
alloy: Ge 0.5, P 0.5
experimental[2] Chen 2022
cites Wadsten 1967 doi
Table I, p. 2, row 13
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Hongqun Dong, Xiaoma Tao, Mervi Paulasto-Kröckel, Calculation of Phase Diagrams and First-Principles Study of Germanium Impacts on Phosphorus Distribution in Czochralski Silicon, Journal of Elec Materi 50, 4272-4288 (2021). doi:10.1007/s11664-021-08861-4
  2. Shanxiong Chen, Jiong Wang, Shangzhao Yu, Biao Hu, Qing Wu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ge-X (X = As, Se, S, P) Systems, J. Electron. Mater. 51, 2114-2130 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11664-022-09474-1